We are all aware of when and where we require home disaster preparedness kits, as numerous unfortunate events have taken place in recent times. Apart from displaying the wrath of nature, these incidents have also brought something else into the light, i.e. the effectiveness of home disaster preparedness kits. One of the main drawbacks behind the same stands to be its general creation and how it has come into the picture. So to get a clear view about the same, let’s go into detail in order to analyze these kits and figure out the problem.
1. The Main Cause for Concern
The main idea behind providing these kits is to make individuals self-sustainable and reduce the workload on first responders. But such aspects tend to go out of the window, as no one actually builds these kits. Yes, that’s right. When you look into places like North-eastern Alabama, research indicates a production of 7.4%, which itself is another disaster. Few among the main reasons were laziness, inertia and other such aspects that promote people to take a step back when it comes to being prepared.
2. Social Inequalities
It is quite sad to note down the presence of social inequalities when it comes to receiving preparedness kits. Thanks to research and other forms of study, people have discovered that the rich are more likely to receive these kits when compared to the poor. This brings together another problem because poor people are the ones who get hurt the most during natural disasters. Due to that, one cannot classify these kits to be effective when it is not able to reach the ones that need help.
Apart from that, people are also worried about whether or not these kits will be useful. Since the resources are inconsistent, there is no particular way of saying that these kits are efficient. While listening to the government and the many instructions that they provide during such times is essential, one needs to conduct a substantial check into Home Disaster Preparedness Kits.